Brexit: UK to consider longer transition period

Media playback is unsupported on your device

UK government sources say they would consider an extension to the UK’s transition out of the EU by a few months, if needed.

The move could buy the two sides more time to come up with a solution to the problem of the Irish border.

It comes after a summit of EU leaders in Brussels failed to make decisive progress in reaching an agreement.

The UK leaves the EU in March, and the current plan is for the transition period to finish at the end of 2020.

Some some Brexit-backing MPs have reacted angrily to the idea of extending this period.

It could mean the UK would have to follow EU rules for longer and would be likely to mean the UK paying billions more pounds to the EU.

Government sources said the extension was a contingency plan and was not expected to be used. They added that it was just one idea at this stage.

Theresa May addressed her 27 European counterparts on Wednesday evening, urging them to give ground and end the current Brexit deadlock.

However, they said it was up to her to offer new ideas, and declared that insufficient progress had been made to call a special summit next month to draft a withdrawal deal.

Both sides did, though, agree to keep talking.

The UK is due to leave the EU on 29 March 2019 – but an agreement on how this will happen is proving elusive amid differences over how to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic.

The UK has signed up to the principle of a backstop – an insurance policy designed to prevent the need for customs checks – but the two sides cannot agree over what form the backstop will take and how long it will last.

As it stands, the transition period – in which the UK would remain in the single market and customs union – is set to last until 31 December 2020.

The UK Parliament would have to agree to any extension and some MPs are warning that Mrs May will face a rebellion if she tries to do it.

‘It just wouldn’t fly’

BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg

To many people, the idea of taking more time to sort things out will sound perfectly sensible. But to others, including many Tory MPs, it would mean the UK being trapped in the status quo until 2022

And more to the point, potentially having to promise to pay the EU billions more, without quite knowing for what.

And there’s one giant problem. It’s hard to see how it could get through the House of Commons. One former Remainer MP told me « it just wouldn’t fly ».

Iain Duncan Smith, the prominent Brexiteer, said « why are we agreeing to extend for another year when we have nothing back in return ». Nick Boles, an influential former minister, wrote on Twitter, « good luck with that ».

  • Read Laura’s full blog

Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said a longer transition period was not a substitute for a concrete agreement over the backstop.

But he said the idea would have some merit, adding « if it did help to reassure people that the backstop would never be activated, that would be a positive thing ».

Brexiteers, though, claimed Mrs May had conceded ground again without getting anything in return. One long-term critic, Nadine Dorries MP, said it was time for her to let someone else – namely ex-Brexit secretary David Davis – negotiate instead.

That was echoed by another backbencher, Andrea Jenkyns, who said the extension proposal was « completely ridiculous », and if Mrs May was struggling in the talks she should be replaced.

Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage said a longer transition period would delay full withdrawal almost until the general election – currently scheduled for May 2022 – and « may mean we never leave at all ».

The president of the European Parliament, Antonio Tajani, suggested Mrs May was « neutral » on the idea of extending the transition but had shown willingness to look into the possibility.

  • What is a ‘Canada-style’ trade deal?

While not commenting on the transition issue, No 10 said Mrs May had asked EU leaders to work with the UK to find a creative way out of their current dilemmas.

Downing Street emphasised the solution lay in agreeing a future framework for an ambitious trade deal so the backstop would not be needed.

‘Meaningful vote’

At the same time, a row has erupted back in Westminster over plans for Parliament to get a vote on any Brexit deal.

Some in Parliament want more than just a « take it or leave it » choice – with options for another referendum or further negotiations to be available.

But in a letter to the House of Commons procedure committee, Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab appeared to suggest that isn’t going to happen because, he says, the British public needs certainty first and foremost.

Prominent Remain-supporting MPs are now demanding assurances that Parliament will be able to assert its authority and amend any deal Mrs May secures.

Please upgrade your browser

Your guide to Brexit jargon

Source: BBC

Related posts